<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pay for Performance SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pageviews.com/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pageviews.com/blog</link>
	<description>SEO Conversations and Discoveries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:35:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Live Longer With Facebook?</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/live-longer-with-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/live-longer-with-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 14:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead facebook profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pageviews.com/blog/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to live longer? Well, it&#8217;s possible if you&#8217;re on Facebook. The numbers suggest that the amount of Facebook users that will die in 2010 might reach well over 1 million. Many of those users&#8217; Facebook pages are never taken &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/live-longer-with-facebook/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/live-longer-with-facebook/">Live Longer With Facebook?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to live longer? Well, it&#8217;s possible if you&#8217;re on Facebook. The numbers suggest that the amount of Facebook users that will die in 2010 might reach well over 1 million. Many of those users&#8217; Facebook pages are never taken down or “memorialized”. Facebook just waits patiently for the next update that will never come. <a href="http://1000memories.com/blog/22-the-rise-of-the-dead-how-many-ghosts-are-on-facebook-?locale=en">Read more</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/live-longer-with-facebook/">Live Longer With Facebook?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/live-longer-with-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of the reciprocal link request</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/beware-of-the-reciprocal-link-request/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/beware-of-the-reciprocal-link-request/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>terrymickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pageviews.com/blog/?p=109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being a link builder that has built tens of thousands of links, I get a lot of requests for link exchanges. These days these link exchange requests come primarily from out of country webmasters and link building companies. I suspect &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/beware-of-the-reciprocal-link-request/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/beware-of-the-reciprocal-link-request/">Beware of the reciprocal link request</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a link builder that has built tens of thousands of links, I get a lot of requests for link exchanges. These days these link exchange requests come primarily from out of country webmasters and link building companies. I suspect this happens because of the low cost of outsourced labor and the lack of knowledge by website owners thinking that link exchanges are still effective. Quite frankly I haven&#8217;t bothered looking at any link exchange requests in a long time. However the one that follows made it through my spam filters and caught my eye. To me, this is both ingenious and sad. Sad because it takes advantage of the webmaster who does not know better.</p>
<p>The link builder who sent this e-mail preys upon those who do not understand link building. They state as fact “As you know, linking benefits both of us by raising our search rankings and generating more traffic to both of our sites.”</p>
<p>Of course link building does benefit both sites. However nowhere in this message does the link builder offer a reciprocal link (which provides very limited benefit) or even offer to provide a link back from another site. Instead, this link builder implies that I will receive benefit for giving them a link. I think a lot of webmasters are still conditioned to think that if you put a link up the person you link to will give you a reciprocal link.</p>
<p>I have changed the name e-mail address and URL in the following message.</p>
<p>Barton hoode barton.hoode@some.com<br />
4:06 AM (4 hours ago)</p>
<p>Dear Webmaster</p>
<p>I am barton woot of myfinancialdream.org</p>
<p>As you know, linking benefits both of us by raising our search rankings and generating more traffic to both of our sites.</p>
<p>My link information is below:</p>
<p>Title       : Debt Consolidation</p>
<p>URL        : http://www.myfinancialdream.org/debt-consolidation-page.htm</p>
<p>Desc      : American Financial Solutions &#8211; Non-Profit Agency: Free, confidential, debt counseling and debt management options.  One low monthly payment, lower interest rates and fees.</p>
<p>HTML code for the above information is :</p>
<p>&lt;a href=&#8221;http://www.myfinancialdream.org/debt-consolidation-page.htm&#8221;&gt;Debt Consolidation&lt;/a&gt; -American Financial Solutions &#8211; Non-Profit Agency: Free, confidential, debt counseling and debt management options.<br />
One low monthly payment, lower interest rates and fees.</p>
<p>Awaiting for your positive reply with exact URL where my link is present.If you are not the concerned person, please forward my email to your webmaster.</p>
<p>Thanks &amp; Regards,<br />
Barton<br />
barton.woot@some.com</p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/beware-of-the-reciprocal-link-request/">Beware of the reciprocal link request</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/beware-of-the-reciprocal-link-request/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good News for Sites Hit by Google Panda Update 2011</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/good-news-for-sites-hit-by-google-panda-update-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/good-news-for-sites-hit-by-google-panda-update-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google algorithm 2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panda update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pageviews.com/blog/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was confirmed by Google that last week a minor change was made in the newest set of algorithm changes for this year. Of course they are downplaying it as one of the 500 changes that are made yearly to &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/good-news-for-sites-hit-by-google-panda-update-2011/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/good-news-for-sites-hit-by-google-panda-update-2011/">Good News for Sites Hit by Google Panda Update 2011</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was confirmed by Google that last week a minor change was made in the newest set of algorithm changes for this year. Of course they are downplaying it as one of the 500 changes that are made yearly to their algorithm. However, for our website, and many of our clients, we have seen some improvements that have put us in better shape in search results than we were before the first major updates hit earlier this year. While all of our content creation and linking techniques were Google friendly, some of our rankings and those of other wrongfully penalized client websites were still struggling to even out.</p>
<p>According to the buzz on the web, and articles about the recent changes like this one from Web Pro News: <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/daniweb-claims-110-recovery-from-google-panda-update-2011-07">http://www.webpronews.com/daniweb-claims-110-recovery-from-google-panda-update-2011-07</a> , the latest update has made big improvements to search rankings for a large number of sites that had been victims of the large Panda updates in April. It gives some of us Webmasters who felt unfairly penalized by the update some hope for a full recovery. I am going to continue keeping my eyes on how these latest changes have affected other websites and companies!</p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/good-news-for-sites-hit-by-google-panda-update-2011/">Good News for Sites Hit by Google Panda Update 2011</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/good-news-for-sites-hit-by-google-panda-update-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is human search VS Automation back in style?</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/is-human-search-vs-automation-back-in-style/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/is-human-search-vs-automation-back-in-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pageviews.com/blog/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read an article on CNN discussing, once again, the problems with spam appearing in Google search results.  Of course once again the topic of using human editors to rate sites has been brought up. According to the article &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/is-human-search-vs-automation-back-in-style/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/is-human-search-vs-automation-back-in-style/">Is human search VS Automation back in style?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an article on CNN discussing, once again, the problems with spam appearing in Google search results.  Of course once again the topic of using human editors to rate sites has been brought up.</p>
<p>According to the article the issue is created by marketers and SEO companies. They claim that the results delivered for &#8220;money&#8221; keywords are nothing but spam and that it is due to the proliferation of easy to generate content tools.</p>
<p>Of course the solution the author presents is to manually review sites. There are over a Billion pages on the internet so good luck with that!</p>
<p>Anyway, here is the link to the article. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/web/01/13/people.power.cashmore/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/web/01/13/people.power.cashmore/index.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/is-human-search-vs-automation-back-in-style/">Is human search VS Automation back in style?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/is-human-search-vs-automation-back-in-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Link Building for Bing</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/9/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getfoundlocal.com/pageviews/2010/02/9/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bing recently published a document about link building. Although it focuses on how Bing deals with inbound links, it can also help you to get better links for Google, Yahoo and other search engines. The most important points of Bing&#8217;s &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/9/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/9/">Link Building for Bing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing recently published a document about link building. Although it<br />
focuses on how Bing deals with inbound links, it can also help you to get better<br />
links for Google, Yahoo and other search engines. The most important points of<br />
Bing&#8217;s document can be found in this article.</p>
<p><strong>The importance of link building</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>The Bing engineers know that link building is important and they describe<br />
link building as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Link building is a very important form of self-promotion on the Web. You<br />
contact webmasters of other, related websites and let them know your site<br />
exists. If the value that you have worked so hard to instill in your site is<br />
evident to them, they will assist their own customers by linking back to your<br />
site. That, my friend, is the essence of link building.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>In other words, reciprocal linking is fine. They also remind webmasters that<br />
link building is an ongoing process:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Think of link building as your chance to build your reputation on the<br />
Web. As your website is likely one of your business&#8217; most valuable assets, <span class="marker">consider link building to be a primary business-building<br />
exercise</span>. Just don&#8217;t make the mistake of believing it will result in<br />
instant gratification. Successful link building efforts require a long-term<br />
commitment, not an overnight or turnkey solution. <span class="marker">You need to<br />
continually invest in link building efforts with creativity and time.</span><br />
Good things come to those who wait (and work<br />
smartly!).&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Things that you can do to get good links to your website</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ibusinesspromoter.com/linkbuilding/link-builder.htm" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.axandra.com/images/inbound-links.gif" alt="inbound links" border="0" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Here are the things that Bing recommends:</p>
<ul>
<li>You should develop your website as a brand and brand it consistently. People<br />
like to link to high quality websites.</li>
<li>You should find relevant bloggers, industry websites and product reviewers<br />
and make them aware of your website.</li>
<li>You can publish concise and informative press releases online.</li>
<li>You can publish expert articles in article directories.</li>
<li>You can participate in relevant conversations on blogs and forums and add a<br />
link to your website when applicable.</li>
<li>You can use social networks to connect to industry influencers. Your<br />
profiles should contain links to your website.</li>
<li>You can use email newsletters to notify people about new content on your<br />
website.</li>
<li>You can launch a blog or a forum on your website.</li>
<li>You can participate in relevant industry associations and their online<br />
forums.</li>
<li>You should strive to become a trusted expert voice for your industry while<br />
promoting your website.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Warning: the following things will get your website in trouble</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Just like Google and other major search engines, Bing doesn&#8217;t like to be<br />
cheated. If they detect unnatural linking patterns, your website might be<br />
penalized. The following things can trigger search engine filters:</p>
<ul>
<li>Your website get a lot of additional inbound links a very short time.</li>
<li>Many links that point to your website are from unrelated websites or blog<br />
comments.</li>
<li>Your web pages contain hidden links.</li>
<li>You get links from links farms or automated link exchange systems.</li>
<li>Paid links point to your website.</li>
<li>Known spammers link to your website.</li>
<li>Your website links to known spammers.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here&#8217;s what Bing does when they find suspicious data that is related to your<br />
website:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;When probable manipulation is detected, a spam rank factor is applied to<br />
a site, depending upon the type and severity of the infraction. If the spam<br />
rating is high, a site can be penalized with a lowered rank. If the violations<br />
are egregious, a site can be temporarily or even permanently purged from the<br />
index.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Getting inbound links requires some work. The Bing engineers are very clear<br />
about this fact: <em>&#8220;Make no mistake: getting legitimate and highly valuable,<br />
inbound links is not a couch-potato task.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Fortunately, there is a product available called IBP that will help you get links and optimize your site. You can <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a title="linking software" href="http://www.Axandra.com/go.to/linkagexpress">Download it here.</a> </span></p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter397.htm#facts#ixzz0eiLwPeDQ">http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter397.htm#facts#ixzz0eiLwPeDQ</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/9/">Link Building for Bing</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore Reports Global Search Market Growth of 46 Percent in 2009</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine growth 2009]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getfoundlocal.com/pageviews/2010/02/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Sites Accounts for Two-Thirds of 131 Billion Searches Conducted Worldwide in December while Introduction of Bing Helps Microsoft Post Significant Gains During the Year Reston, VA, January 22, 2010 – comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader in measuring the &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/">comScore Reports Global Search Market Growth of 46 Percent in 2009</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="cfx" id="subMasthead"></div>
<div class="sectionBreak grid_16">
<hr />
</div>
<div class="grid_12" id="mainColumn"><a id="eztoc77993_0_0_1" name="eztoc77993_0_0_1"></a></p>
<p><strong><em>Google Sites Accounts for Two-Thirds of 131 Billion Searches Conducted<br />
Worldwide in December while Introduction of Bing Helps Microsoft Post<br />
Significant Gains During the Year</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Reston, VA, January 22, 2010 </strong>– comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR), a leader<br />
in measuring the digital world, today released a study on growth in the global<br />
search market in 2009. The study revealed that the U.S. remains the largest<br />
search market worldwide, while Google Sites retains a commanding position in the<br />
global search market.</p>
<p>“The global search market continues to grow at an extraordinary rate, with<br />
both highly developed and emerging markets contributing to the strong growth<br />
worldwide,” said Jack Flanagan, comScore executive vice president. “Search is<br />
clearly becoming a more ubiquitous behavior among Internet users that drives<br />
navigation not only directly from search engines but also within sites and<br />
across networks. If you equate the advancement of search with the ability of<br />
humans to cultivate information, then the world is rapidly becoming a more<br />
knowledgeable ecosystem.”</p>
<p><strong>Top Search Markets Worldwide</strong></p>
<p>The total worldwide search market boasted more than 131 billion searches<br />
conducted by people age 15 or older from home and work locations in December<br />
2009, representing a 46-percent increase in the past year. This number<br />
represents more than 4 billion searches per day, 175 million per hour, and 2.9<br />
million per minute. The U.S. represented the largest individual search market in<br />
the world with 22.7 billion searches, or approximately 17 percent of searches<br />
conducted globally. China ranked second with 13.3 billion searches, followed by<br />
Japan with 9.2 billion and the U.K. with 6.2 billion. Among the top ten global<br />
search markets, Russia posted the highest gains in 2009, growing 92 percent to<br />
3.3 billion, followed by France (up 61 percent to 5.4 billion) and Brazil (up 53<br />
percent to 3.8 billion).</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" class="renderedtable" width="400">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top" width="533"><strong>Top 10 Countries by Number of Searches<br />
Conducted*</strong><br /><strong>December 2009 vs. December 2008</strong><br /><strong>Total Worldwide,<br />
Age 15+ &#8211; Home &amp; Work Locations</strong><br /><strong>Source: comScore qSearch</strong>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="213">&#0160; </td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="320"><strong>Searches (MM)</strong> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="107"><strong>Dec-2008</strong> </td>
<td valign="top" width="107"><strong>Dec-2009</strong> </td>
<td valign="top" width="107"><strong>Percent Change</strong> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="213"><em>Worldwide</em> </td>
<td valign="top" width="107"><em>89,708</em> </td>
<td valign="top" width="107"><em>131,354</em> </td>
<td valign="top" width="107"><em>46%</em> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="213">United States </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">18,688 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">22,741 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">22% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="213">China </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">11,778 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">13,278 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">13% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="213">Japan </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">6,213 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">9,170 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">48% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="213">United Kingdom </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">4,623 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">6,245 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">35% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="213">Germany </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">4,079 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">5,609 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">38% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="213">France </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">3,362 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">5,425 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">61% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="213">South Korea </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">2,796 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">4,039 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">44% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="213">Brazil </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">2,454 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">3,763 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">53% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="213">Canada </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">2,900 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">3,710 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">28% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="213">Russian Federation </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">1,735 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">3,333 </td>
<td valign="top" width="107">92% </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>*Searches based on “expanded search” definition, which includes searches<br />
at the top properties where search activity is observed, not only the core<br />
search engines.</em></p>
<p><strong>Top Search Properties Worldwide</strong></p>
<p>Google Sites ranked as the top search property worldwide with 87.8 billion<br />
searches in December, or 66.8 percent of the global search market. Google Sites<br />
achieved a 58-percent increase in search query volume over the past year. Yahoo!<br />
Sites ranked second globally with 9.4 billion searches (up 13 percent), followed<br />
by Chinese search engine Baidu with 8.5 billion searches (up 7 percent).<br />
Microsoft Sites saw the greatest gains among the top five properties, growing 70<br />
percent to 4.1 billion searches, on the strength of its successful introduction<br />
of new search engine Bing. Russian search engine Yandex also achieved<br />
considerable gains, growing 91 percent to 1.9 billion searches.</p>
<table border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" class="renderedtable" width="409">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="4" valign="top" width="545"><strong>Top 10 Search Properties by Searches<br />
Conducted</strong><br /><strong>December 2009 vs. December 2008</strong><br /><strong>Total Worldwide,<br />
Age 15+ &#8211; Home &amp; Work Locations</strong><br /><strong>Source: comScore qSearch</strong>
</td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="253">&#0160; </td>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="292"><strong>Searches (MM)</strong> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="97"><strong>Dec-2008</strong> </td>
<td valign="top" width="97"><strong>Dec-2009</strong> </td>
<td valign="top" width="97"><strong>Percent Change</strong> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="253"><em>Worldwide </em></td>
<td valign="top" width="97"><em>89,708</em> </td>
<td valign="top" width="97"><em>131,354</em> </td>
<td valign="top" width="97"><em>46%</em> </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="253">Google Sites </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">55,638 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">87,809 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">58% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="253">Yahoo! Sites </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">8,389 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">9,444 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">13% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="253">Baidu.com Inc. </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">7,963 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">8,534 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">7% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="253">Microsoft Sites </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">2,403 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">4,094 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">70% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="253">eBay </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,327 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">2,102 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">58% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="253">NHN Corporation </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,892 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">2,069 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">9% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="253">Yandex </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">992 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,892 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">91% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="253">Facebook.com </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,023 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,572 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">54% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bgdark">
<td valign="top" width="253">Ask Network </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,053 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,507 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">43% </td>
</tr>
<tr class="bglight">
<td valign="top" width="253">Alibaba.com Corporation </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,118 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">1,102 </td>
<td valign="top" width="97">-1% </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em>*Searches based on “expanded search” definition, which includes searches<br />
at the top properties where search activity is observed, not only the core<br />
search engines.</em></p>
<p><strong>About comScore</strong><br />comScore, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOR) is a global leader in<br />
measuring the digital world and preferred source of digital marketing<br />
intelligence. For more information, please visit <a href="http://www.comscore.com/companyinfo" target="_self">www.comscore.com/companyinfo</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Contact:</strong><br />Andrew Lipsman<br />Director, Marketing<br />
Communications<br />comScore, Inc. <br />+1 312 775 6510<br /><a href="mailto:press@comscore.com" target="_self">press@comscore.com</a></p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/">comScore Reports Global Search Market Growth of 46 Percent in 2009</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/comscore-reports-global-search-market-growth-of-46-percent-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Oracle Service Fees Still Worth It?</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getfoundlocal.com/pageviews/2010/02/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#34;Software as a Service&#34; biggies Oracle and SAP make billions selling businesses maintenance and support contracts guaranteeing access to the latest updates and to the helpdesks for these all-in-one business-management software systems. But in these penny-pinching times, the Wall Street &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/">Are Oracle Service Fees Still Worth It?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Software as a Service&quot; biggies Oracle and SAP make billions selling businesses maintenance and support contracts guaranteeing access to the latest updates and to the helpdesks for these all-in-one business-management software systems. But in these penny-pinching times, the Wall Street Journal reports, some Oracle customers are switching their service contracts to lower-cost providers. Salesforce.com says it&#39;s been poaching Oracle customers for its CRM service. The Journal cites Rimini Street as another beneficiary; the company&#39;s site promises a 50% cut in service fees for SAP customers. If you&#39;re wondering whether to stay or go, you might seek guidance from the Independent Oracle Users Group. &#8212; <em>Jeff B. Copeland, Content Product Manager</em></p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/">Are Oracle Service Fees Still Worth It?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/are-oracle-service-fees-still-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phoenix Charter School &#8211; Phoenix Charter Schools &#8211; AmeriSchools</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getfoundlocal.com/pageviews/2009/12/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phoenix Charter Schools Spotlight on Leadership DeeAnn Chan is an AmeriSchools success story. DeeAnn started with AmeriSchools as a novice teacher in 1998. Her knowledge of curriculum and classroom skills made her a logical choice for leadership. Over the past &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/">Phoenix Charter School &#8211; Phoenix Charter Schools &#8211; AmeriSchools</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p class="title style2"><strong>Phoenix Charter Schools Spotlight on Leadership<br />
</strong></p>
<p><img alt="Phoenix Charter Schools Spotlight on Leadership" class="float_left" height="194" src="images/MrsChan.JPG" width="131" />
</p>
<p>
DeeAnn Chan is an AmeriSchools success story. DeeAnn started with AmeriSchools as a novice teacher in 1998. Her knowledge of curriculum and classroom skills made her a logical choice for leadership. Over the past years, DeeAnn was selected as Principal, earned her Masters Degree in Educational Leadership from NAU, became a mother to Alex (3 years old) and led AmeriSchools to reach improved academic goals each year. DeeAnn has introduced the World Famous FISH! Philosophy, expanded implementation of Spalding Language Arts, supported school-wide music and physical education programs and created a family friendly learning community. DeeAnn leads by example and demonstrates daily how we each make a difference in the lives of children.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><small>via <a href="http://www.amerischools.org/camelback.html">Phoenix Charter School</a></small></p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/">Phoenix Charter School &#8211; Phoenix Charter Schools &#8211; AmeriSchools</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/phoenix-charter-school-phoenix-charter-schools-amerischools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The effect of your URL structure on your Google rankings</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[url structure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getfoundlocal.com/pageviews/2009/09/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does Google care about the position of a web page on your server? Does it make a difference if a web page is in the root directory of your website or in a sub directory? How does your URL structure &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/">The effect of your URL structure on your Google rankings</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Google care about the position of a web page on your server?<br />
Does it make a difference if a web page is in the root directory of<br />
your website or in a sub directory? How does your URL structure<br />
influence the position of your web pages in Google&#39;s search results?</p>
<p><strong>Trailing slashes and sub directories</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>A popular assumption is that Google prefers pages that are in the root directory of a website.</p>
<p>
If an URL contains many trailing slashes (meaning the page is placed in<br />
a sub-sub-directory) then Google might not think that the page is<br />
important in relation to the other pages.</p>
<p>Although this statement is often repeated in SEO forums, it is probably not true.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img /></p>
<p><strong>The visibility of a web page counts, not its position</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>If<br />
a web page is linked throughout your website and if the page has<br />
inbound links then the web page will be indexed and ranked by Google<br />
without any problems.</p>
<p>Most web pages on today&#39;s websites<br />
are created dynamically and the URL that is displayed in a web browser<br />
presents only a virtual site structure that is not really available on<br />
the server.</p>
<p>As there are no real folders on the server,<br />
search engines won&#39;t find a valuable ranking signal if they look at<br />
things like presence or absence of directories.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>What does this mean for your website?</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>If<br />
you want to show search engines that a page on your website is<br />
important, link to it from many other pages of your website so that it<br />
can easily be found.</p>
<p>A page that gets many links (both<br />
from your own website and from other websites) will get the attention<br />
that it deserves from Google&#39;s indexing robot.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>When you should care about the structure of your URLs</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>1. URL stripping can cause problems</p>
<p>Rumor<br />
has it that Google uses URL stripping to index web pages. That means<br />
that Google shortens the path to an URL to find new pages on a site.<br />
For example, <em>&quot;<a href="http://www.example.com/folder/keyword.htm" target="_blank">www.example.com/folder/<wbr />keyword.htm</a>&quot;</em> would be shortened to <em>&quot;<a href="http://www.example.com/folder/" target="_blank">www.example.com/folder/</a>&quot;.</em></p>
<p>If<br />
you use dynamically created URLs then you should make sure that all<br />
virtual folders return real web pages a &quot;404 not found&quot; pages.<br />
Otherwise, Google might think that you have many faulty pages and/or<br />
that your website has a low quality.</p>
<p>2. Shorter URLs can be better for your website visitors</p>
<p>Although<br />
most web surfers don&#39;t pay attention to the URL in the browser address<br />
bar, shorter URLs can enhance the user experience. Shorter URLs are<br />
easier to remember and they can improve the direct type-in traffic.</p>
<p>3. Short URLs get more clicks</p>
<p>A<br />
search marketing study found out that web surfers clicked short URLs<br />
twice as often as long URLs in Google&#39;s search results. Long URLs are<br />
cut off in Google search engine result pages. Web surfers cannot see<br />
where they are going to go and this can decrease the click-through rate.</p>
<p>4. The URLs of your web pages can contain your keywords</p>
<p>The<br />
words that appear in the URL of a web page can influence the position<br />
of the web page for these words. For that reason, it can make sense to<br />
rewrite your URLs so that they include the keywords for which you want<br />
to have high rankings.</p>
<p>Article from the weekly newsletter of <a href="http://www.Axandra.com/go.to/linkagexpress" title="ibusiness promoter - free copy"></a><a href="http://www.Axandra.com/go.to/linkagexpress" title="ibusiness promoter">IBusiness Promoter. Download a free copy here</a>. </p>
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/">The effect of your URL structure on your Google rankings</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/the-effect-of-your-url-structure-on-your-google-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do search engine marketers think about reciprocal links?</title>
		<link>http://pageviews.com/blog/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/</link>
		<comments>http://pageviews.com/blog/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Mickelson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inbound links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocal links]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getfoundlocal.com/pageviews/2009/09/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are three main factions: Group 1: reciprocal links have no effect at all on the position of a website in the search results on Google. Group 2: reciprocal links work just like any other inbound links. Group 3: there&#39;s &#8230; <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/">What do search engine marketers think about reciprocal links?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>There are three main factions:</strong><br />
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>Group 1: reciprocal links have no effect at all on the position of a website in the search results on Google.
</li>
<li>Group 2: reciprocal links work just like any other inbound links.
</li>
<li>Group 3: there&#39;s a threshold value. For example, you shouldn&#39;t have more than 33% reciprocal inbound links.</li>
</ul>
<p>Which group is right and should you use reciprocal links with your website or not?</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Is there a threshold value for reciprocal links?</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>Webmasters<br />
in group 3 think that a high number of reciprocal links is a red flag<br />
for search engines. The idea behind this is that links should not be<br />
trusted if (for example) 100% of a site&#39;s inbound links are reciprocal.</p>
<p>However,<br />
this is not really a good indicator. If high quality websites do link<br />
to each other, they won&#39;t harm their rankings in any way. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>For some sites, it is normal to have a high reciprocity percentage</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.linkagexpress.com">Link building expert</a> Eric Ward recently did a <a href="http://www.ericward.com/bestpractices/2009/08/linkmoses-resurrected-5-why-reciprocal.html" target="_blank">test</a>. He found out that there are websites for which it is perfectly normal that they have almost 100% reciprocal links.</p>
<p>The<br />
more specific the topic of a website is, the more likely it is that it<br />
will have a high reciprocity percentage. As an example, Eric Ward used<br />
the website of &quot;The Southeastern Bat Diversity Network&quot;, an<br />
organization with a goal to &quot;conserve bats and their habitats in<br />
southeastern North America through collaborative research, education,<br />
and management.&quot;</p>
<p>The top sites in that subject are all<br />
linked back and forth to all other websites that write about bats. This<br />
is not surprising and it shows that a high number of reciprocal links<br />
can also be a sign of high quality. It depends on the topic of the<br />
website.</p>
<p>If the websites were about different topics, then the reciprocal links would look suspicious.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Should you use reciprocal links for your website or not?</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>You<br />
don&#39;t have to worry if a link is a reciprocal link or not. That does<br />
not matter. Reciprocal links are neither good nor bad. They are just<br />
links and it always depends on the individual link whether it is a good<br />
link or a bad link. </p>
<p>If a link comes from a website that<br />
is related to your website then it is a good link. If the other website<br />
is related to yours then you can link back and this won&#39;t cause any<br />
problems. As long as you make sure that the links make sense to your<br />
website visitors then everything is okay.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You can use IBP&#39;s <a href="http://www.Axandra.com/go.to/linkagexpress">link building tool</a><br />
to get links to your website. IBP can help you with one-way links,<br />
reciprocal links, links from blogs, links from related websites, links<br />
from Internet directories and much more. It is a spam-free link<br />
building tool that helps you to get high quality links.</p>
<p><a href="http://pageviews.com/blog/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/">What do search engine marketers think about reciprocal links?</a> is a post from: <a href="http://pageviews.com/blog">Pay for Performance SEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pageviews.com/blog/what-do-search-engine-marketers-think-about-reciprocal-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

